CSS Flexible Flow Module
April 10, 2009
We have published official proposal about ‘flow’ and flex units used in h-smile core:
CSS Flexible Flow Module
With the hope that the Web will benefit from them.
products and projects
- Pages
Blogroll
- Categories:
- Archives:
- February 2012
- December 2011
- October 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- July 2009
- April 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- August 2006
- Meta:
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Feb | Jul » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |||
> With the hope that the Web will benefit from them.
Now that I got used to Sciter, browsers look so lame. Little things like flex units and “flow” make so big difference. Browsers support so much fancy stuff that are of little use, yet Sciter nails the essential points… Thanks.
Comment by bobef — April 11, 2009 @ 11:16 am
Is there anything we can do to increase the probability that this will be adopted?
Flex units would make web development SOOOOOOOO much easier. Percentages just don’t cut it because they are incompatible with margin and padding.
Comment by Bug Slayer — May 19, 2009 @ 3:57 pm
“what we can do?”
To cry aloud on each corner of the Web.
I am serious – seems like this is the only way to convince UA vendors and/or W3C to adopt something.
Comment by Andrew — May 19, 2009 @ 10:38 pm